I'm very into film and photography, I want a camera that can deliver good quality photos but also a good video. So far I've heared tht the canon T3i is ver affordable and give great results. But recently I've heared that the Nikon D51000 DSLR also is very useful and gives great results. I don't know weather to get the cannon or Nikon. Please help me. Wich do you perfer? And if you have one or have used one, how was your expirence? Answers are appreciated.
How often does the NICE N88 bus run from Freeport to Jones Beach?
Trying to figure out how much time to leave for the Florence and the Machine concert at Nikon at Jones Beach tonight. The schedule online doesn't work, there's no way to reach anyone during the week and I know it runs at least an hour before the concert, but I don't know how frequently it runs.
Can i convert my SLR Nikon FM 2 camera to a digital one?
Can i convert my SLR Nikon FM 2 camera to a digital one?
Best walkaround zoom lens (any brand, DX or FX) for Nikon DX camera?
At the moment, my "common focal lengths" lens is the Nikon 18-55mm kit lens. It would be nice to get something with some more length (At least 70mm but preferably longer). Having 18mm is nice, but a little less wide wouldn't be a big issue. I'd also like it if it were possible to get a wider aperture. Obviously I'd rather have a low price, minimal weight and great image quality but I know you can't have everything. What do you think is my best option if I had, say, a max budget of a little over a thousand dollars.
Anyone else jonesing for the D600?
Nikon is about to release the D600 full-frame dSLR for about $2000. The specs and features are ridiculous and I'm confident it will be a significant home-run. Can't wait to get mine!
Good camera to be taking pictures of models and people?
I'm a fashion blogger and going to start taking pictures of London street style as well as taking pictures from fashion shows and I really need a good camera.
I need help with this as I have no clue about cameras, I don't want ordinary digital camera as I have one already. Suggestions please, everyone says Nikon and Kodak are good ones. I'm willing to invest about £200 that is around $380.
Which of these dsrl cameras is best for beginners?
I'm looking to start photography so I'm looking for a new camera (dslr) I've found 3 that I really like… Which one is best?
canon 1100D with a dc lense -£319
A Nikon D3100-£362
Or Sony A37-£419
I'm interested in the camera having with good frames per second so I can take pictures of fast moving objects, so if you could tell me which of these has the best fps I'd greatly appreciate it.
Feel free to suggest other good dslr cameras for beginers. However I can only stretch to abouts £420-450
Looking for an Online shop of Japan for electronics?
Hi, is there any japan international online shop for electronics? If yes, can you give me a link? I'm dying to buy Nikon J1 in pink.thanks! Iv'e tried to go on Yamada Denki online shop but they don't ship outside Japan.
Added (1). Btw, I'm living in Philippines which is part of Asia.
How to turn off the flash on my Nikon DX?
I have recently been exploring the options of my Nikon DX and i can't seem to turn off the flash and it is very bothersome… Does anyone have any experience with this technology that could help me out?
Why don't they make more advanced DX lenses?
I know DX sensors are considered "beginner" or "amateur" cameras because they generally have lower quality than FX sensors. But as technology improves and DX sensors get better quality, I wonder if they could become the new standard for practicality reasons. Lenses for DX can be more compact due to the smaller sensor size, so why do they only make beginner lenses DX only? They could probably make a comparatively compact 70-300 VR if it was DX instead of FX, and it would probably be cheaper too. It seems there's always a premium for FX. Or for the size of the actual Nikon 70-300 VR FX maybe they could make a 70-400 VR DX. Speculating of course.
Anyway, I'm just an amateur so perhaps I'm wrong, but anyway, what are your opinions on the matter?
Added (1). @lucienhu - My point is that you can make DX lenses smaller and cheaper. For me to get, say, a 70-200 F2.8 is impractical in price and also it's not a lens you can just carry around, it's very big and bulky. If they made a similar lens designed for DX only, perhaps it could be a little more practical. And same with the 24-70 2.8, which while still useable, is still rather big and is obviously very expensive.