Nikon D3100 - 18-55mm Lens not good enough, need more zoom
I bought Nikon D3100 camera with 18-55mm lens (package deal), now I notice that it doesn't have enough zoom. I want to know what options I have, shall I sell this and buy 18-105 mm or 18-200mm or buy a 55-105mm lens?
Why do people carry two lens (18-55mm and 55-105mm) when they can get 18-105mm one lens? Is it just price or some other reason.
Please post your iinputs.
Please hurry, I need to order lens before I go on cruise next week.
Added (1). Do I have to buy Nikon lens only or can I buy other brands, Please suggest which brands are good if yes.
Your best deal is to get the 55-200mm AF-S VR lens. That, along with your 18-55mm, gives you a wide 18-200mm range. Now, I have an 18-200mm AF-S VR and love it. It does take the place of two lenses, saving lens-changing time and giving me a lighter package to carry along. When I went to China in 2007, it was the only lens I brought along.
But, the rule of thumb is - the more you expect from one lens, the poorer result you will get. Think of a dedicated all-in-one tool vs a toolbox. Yes, you can do alot with that all-in-one, but a true craftsman uses different tools for each job.
Just remember this. You probably won't be able to sell the 18-55mm for very much. It's better to keep it and suppliment.
As for brands, you can use any Sigma, Tamron, Tokina, or other brand lens that has a built-in autofocus motor.
Here's a partial list for you.
http://en.wikipedia.org/...ocus-motor
If you have any other questions please feel free to email me.
You can add a 55 - 200mm or a 70-300mm, either 1 will give you a mid to long range telephoto ability.
Along with your existing 18-55mm, this combo should cover most of the ground.
Optically speaking, it is easier to control the optical quality for a lower zoom power zoom lens (i.e. 70 - 210mm) vs.a higher zoom power lens (i.e. 28 - 300mm).
Zoom lenses are the worst type of lens next to mirrors. Science made sure of that. Glass elements work best only at a single focal length. Making the lens work on multiple focal lengths degrade picture quality. Many don't see the difference hence the crave for more zoom. I don't blame them.
I don't deal with two zoom lenses. I only have the kit 18-55mm lens. Other than that, I use a box full of manual film prime lenses. They're far much better. As for you, go with what you are comfortable with. There's an 18-300mm Tamron that might tickle your fancy.
You can either decide to keep the 18-55mm lens and get a new Nikkor 55-200mm lens that will give you more range, or decide to sell the 18-55mm lens and get a new Nikkor 18-200mm lens that will replace both.
There are other brands that makes lenses such as Sigma and Tamron, but their quality is usually worse.
You might like this one
Nikon 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED IF AF-S VR Nikkor Zoom Lens for Nikon Digital SLR Cameras
70-300mm telephoto zoom lens with f/4.5-5.6 maximum aperture for Nikon digital SLR cameras
Vibration Reduction (VRII) minimizes effects of camera shake to produce sharper images
2 Extra-Low Dispersion (ED) glass elements delivers super contrast and resolution performance
Internal Focus (IF) system provides fast and quiet autofocusing; 4.9-feet close focus range
Measures 3.1 inches in diameter and 5.6 inches long; weighs 26.3 ounces; 5-year warranty
- Which lens would need a polarizing filter more? A wide angle or a Zoom lens?
- How to fix a zoom lens on a AF-S DX Zoom-Nikkor 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G ED II camera?
- Is 55-200mm lens enough zoom to shoot pictures of a football team across the field?
- Advantages & Disadvantages Of Nikon D3100? What About 18-55mm AF-S Zoom Nikkor Lens?
- I got d3100 nikon, its good but i don't find it to be as good as i want it to be.read more?