What camera brand is better? Nikon or Canon?

I want to know which brand has good high quality for photography.

Canons are the steez. But the Nikons are the bees to thee neez

This question is asked at least 5 times a day.
Answer is always the same.
Canon and Nikon are equal but different - like Coke and Pepsi - some lik eone, some like the other. Both make excellent quality products.

Neither is better, nor are they any better than Pentax, they just spend more on advertising.

Sony do better video.

Olympus are smaller and lighter.

If you're on a budget, Fujifilm produce better bridge cameras than either.

Of course, none of the above will turn you into a professional photographer, you need skill for that, and anyone thick enough to ask this question deserves a Benq.

Nikon, Canon, and Sony are all excellent. All those brands have their enthusiasts. I'm a Nikon user, but if I were to start from scratch I would be having to make a decision on brand very carefully. Please ignore those who totally rubbish any of those brands.

It's not about the camera. Both are excellent brands.

Strongly recommend Sony a57 for you… 10 frames per second at 16 megapixels… Continuous phase detection accurate fast focusing during video and burst mode, 100% viewfinder… Picture effects,… Built in mic jack… Articulated 921k dot screen… Using trublack technology for the screen… Stereo mic built in… Great choice of lenses… Great accessories… Service centers everywhere… Good in low light… And the price is entry level price…

All of your nikons and canons entry level isn't even close