Nikon SLR Cameras

Nikon Zoom lenses - why the big price difference from 80-400 lens and 200-400 zoom lens?

David545
David545

I'm a fairly competent amateur photographer, and have been a Nikon SLR user for a long time. The Nikon 80-400 Zoom lens costs around $1600 (street price). Yet, the Nikon 200-400 Zoom lens costs well over $5, 000. Since the less costly 80-400 lens has a much wider range of operation than the 200-400, I'm wondering what features make the 200-400 so much more costly?

sparbles
sparbles

A quick look at the specs will give you the answer.
It would depend on the quality of the optics, and the perks of each lens.

Jeroen Wijnands
Jeroen Wijnands

Features… The 80-400 is VR but not AF-S. The 200-400 is AF-S.

The 200-400 is a truly stellar optical performer, the 80-400 is merely rather good. Price is indeed an issue, a slightly used 500mm prime also comes in at that budget.

keerok
keerok

Do you also wonder why the 3.5L V6 automatic car is more expensive than one with 1.6L engine and 6-speed manual tranny? Maybe your dilemma is closer to a 6 bedroom, 2 bathroom, 500sqm.floor area 2-floor house compared to a 3 bedroom, 4 bathroom, 2500sqm.floor area range house.

Eclipse
Eclipse

It's not the width of the zoom range that adds to the cost. The complexity of design and cost of materials to make a lens that maintains a constant aperture of f/4 from 200mm to 400mm is considerably higher than that of the 80-400mm. Even a 400mm prime with such a fast aperture is likely to cost well over $2, 000 and would be considerably heavier than the 80-400mm zoom. Beyond that, the 200-400mm is a pro-level, environmentally sealed lens that focuses faster than the 80-400mm.

thephotographer
thephotographer

The 200-400mm has a max aperture of f/4 throughout the zoom range, while the 80-400 only has f/5.6 at its longest setting. This extra f/stop is important to sport photographers who need all the light they can get to use as high as a shutter speed as possible.

The 200-400mm, because of its reduced range, also has better optical quality than the 80-400mm lens. It's also built a lot tougher too- while the 80-400mm lens is made of plastic, the 200-400mm's lens barrel is made of magnesium alloy.

To most people, though differences doesn't warrant a $3000 difference. To pros however, it may be a different story.