Nikon SLR Cameras

Are there any significant improvements with a Nikon 16-85mm compared to an 18-55mm?

3riCa
3riCa

I've been searching for reviews all over the internet on the Nikon 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6G and there are a number who suggest that the Image Quality is similar to that of the kit lens 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G VR. They say that the only advantage of this 16-85mm is the slightly wider end, longer telephoto, and metal mount. Is that really true? Is it pointless to upgrade my kit lens (18-55mm) to this one?

fhotoace
fhotoace

What you have read is probably true.

If you are planning on replacing the 18-55 mm, look instead at the 18-200 mm lens. It is the single lens solution for many photographers

The 16-85 mm lens costs $700. The 18-200 mm only costs $850 and has a much longer reach.

The 18-200 mm is great for shooting sports and action during the day.

Gabriel
Gabriel

Fotoace hit the nail on the head. A 16-85 will not give much benefit other than its slightly longer reach.

Consider the 18-200mm just like Fotoace. Or, you can also consider buying a lens called a 35mm f1.8 DX. It has a wide open aperture which means it can blur backgrounds and allow you to shoot in low light situations.