Nikon Lenses: Any significant difference with those 'special labels' like N, ED?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6898/c6898432c3aaa7cddbcf26d26d777cf259959ee6" alt="3riCa 3riCa"
So, I've come across the very famous Nikkor 35mm f/1.8G and the 35mm f/1.4G. The 1.4 is obviously 6x the price of the 1.8. The 1.4 has "N" and the 1.8G doesn't. Does this make any difference?
What about with ED?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c9762/c97620e41d52001b403d586e4ff41ecea273c73b" alt="keerok keerok"
Although some people will say that f/1.4 is just half, a third or a fourth difference from f/1.8, that difference is a world away. The f/1.4 will significantly take in more light that's why it's that expensive. Compare further to f/1.2 to blow your mind away.
The letters are features (or lack of it) and are explained further in this link.
- Are those point and shoot cameras that look like DSLR any good? From nikon?
- Do wide angle (Nikon) lenses offer a significant benefit over compact zoom lenses?
- Is there a significant difference in lens quality between the Nikon d3000 and Nikon d3100?
- Newer Nikon Camera with significant quality difference over the Nikon D40x?
- Is there a significant difference in image quality between an entry and a professional level dSLR?