Nikon: New Body or New Lens? Usually it's new lens but let me know your thoughts?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4e65/e4e655e0378c7fced5c84dc938a1724e868a768f" alt="harroldreyes harroldreyes"
I'd like to get a good primary camera for wedding photography. I have shot with my D7000, primarily using prime (85mm, 35mm and a 18mm-100mm) and have rented a 70-200 f2.8 (on my body 95% of the time). I also use a fisheye… Now that I have some extra funds - - would you invest in buying the 70-200mm VRII, purchase a D800 with gigantic file size but awesome clarity and great ISO performance or the D600… So Lens or Body?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/381e8/381e872fe1f8b38fbafd01a32715c9ae58687bee" alt="lowlevel lowlevel"
Always lens. The D800 is overkill. But if you are going for a full frame camera you will need a full frame midrange zoom. I'd get a 24-70mm 2.8 for weddings because you don't often have time or space to compose with primes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/160eb/160ebce10fb0e61086601523e0e3810cefe3d5a1" alt="George Y George Y"
The D600 or D800 would be very nice upgrades, going from DX to FX. But two of the three lenses you shoot with regularly, (assuming they're the 35mm f/1.8 and 18-200mm) are DX optics and would force your D600 to drop back to DX mode.
Getting the D600 (about $2000) would leave you room to upgrade your optics as that would save you a about $1000 over the D800.
If you are truly using the 70-200mm f/2.8 so much, then buying one may be a wiser investment. You could also so well finding a first gen 70-200mm, as well.
- How many hours of shooting do you usually do before your battery dies?
- Nikon D70 I know it's older but need to know people's opinions of it?
- Anyone here got the new Nikon D7000? Share your thoughts, please?
- How to make your Nikon D40 let you take pictures without the lens on?
- Could some please let me know what kind of adapter I need?