Photographers, have you ever used a kit lens?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1432a/1432a8bb816820ca729f4675b00474812858618a" alt="Guest Guest"
Until i get my ultra wide 10 to 24 lens hopefully next month i have to use my 18 to 105 kit lens as it is my widest angle lens, for landscapes
it actually is not a bad lens, a pretty fast auto focus and good quality
but still, there's still a stigma about kit lenses, meaning they are not very good
so, when was the last time you used a "mere" kit lens?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7fea9/7fea9ddb28a669824a4fc7facedf8432f1e28b45" alt="Frank Frank"
I bought my very first camera when I was in high school in 1985: a Canon T-70 with a Canon 50mm f/1.8 lens for $249. At that time cameras came with 50mm lenses because zooms were still very expensive. Two years later I sold the camera and lens and bought a Canon T-90 and a variety of prime lenses (24mm, 28mm, 35mm, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.2L, 200mm macro). Since then I've purchased other cameras that were only sold without lenses.
The 18-55 kit lenses of today are far better than the 35-80mm pieces of junk that were sold with film cameras. I think that the bad reputation that those older lenses got has stuck with them to this day.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/796c1/796c14846eebe5324c2b4d9ff205be4c28787f25" alt="Alan Alan"
Surprise - surprise:
A camera manufacture has a reputation to live up to. Do you think a camera maker would market a body and lens combination that will yield substandard images? The camera maker chooses the lens that goes into the camera kit (package) with great care. Usually it will be a zoom that spans "normal" in the center and just touches wide-angle and telephoto on the opposite ends of the zoom duration. The idea is to get a newbie interested so they stick with photography. If the camera kit disappoints all that happens is a quick sale with little incentive for future sales. That's not going to happen if you buy from major camera makers.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/201de/201de2ea02418c8643199061b5e0739725969c76" alt="qrk qrk"
Sure. Still use it on occasion. Works great and has a very good focal length range. My 18-55 lens has been used to take pictures for commercial publication.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c9762/c97620e41d52001b403d586e4ff41ecea273c73b" alt="keerok keerok"
All the time.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/178cd/178cd02ea308f4607a5962bbcb9186356716b8c2" alt="BriaR BriaR"
Of course I used my kit lens for years and thousands of shots before I had the funds to upgrade it.
There are those who wear an expensive "professional" camera around their neck to impress and use it on full auto to take snaps. A little like the poseurs who cruise around in open top Ferraris but haven't a clue how to drive.
And there are those who don't give a penny f*** about what people think and use the gear they have to create the best shots they can.
Don't turn up your nose at the humble 18-55 kit lens. They are a whole lot better than the lens snobs give them credit for!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3968/e3968ba2aaa2e098993aec803d97193eba6dc57d" alt="Vinegar Taster Vinegar Taster"
I've had photos published using my Nikon 18-55mm VR lens. Did a photo shoot of a after wedding dinner party and made $200 for 2 hours of my time.
- Have you ever got bored of something you just bought & its expensive one?
- I used iso 800 on my nikon d5300. Pictures were too grainy. Used kit lens wide open?
- What's the most valuable thing you have ever fixed with glue?
- Have you ever rent a pro Camera? Is it worth rening cams?
- Has anyone ever used a Nikon D40 6.1 MP Digital SLR Camera?