How come fujifilm cameras have poor camera quality?

I'm an amateur photographer, and I'm looking into different camera brands to see which one would suit me best. So far all I've explored are Canon, Nikon, and Fujifilm; and so far they all seem great in picture quality, but for some reason all the video tests and samples that I've seen from the Fujifilm cameras are awful.Am I missing something, or do people just post bad reviews? I'm not sure. Maybe a better question would be what camera would be good for an amateur/beginner? Anyway, let me know!

I own two Fuji cameras, among others, and I've had excellent luck with both. To me you can't believe anyone's review because that's just one person saying what they think. If they're partial, as I'm, to
Canon then all others are bad except Canon - get my drift?

Fuji makes pretty good cameras but given that you don't pay much for them what do you expect. One of my Fuji cameras retails today for $1, 000 and it's an excellent camera. The ones you're probably looking at are in the $200 range. If that's so, you get what you pay for.

If you want quality you're going to have to pay for it.

Sometimes that depends on your luck as well. I think you go for a Nikon one. I have a Nikon D3100 and I'm not a professional photographer. I'm quite happy with my camera.