Filmscanner 120mm (Nikon Coolscan 9000 ED)?
Okay, filmscanner (Nikon Coolscan) is better than flat scanner (Epson Photo) . BUT. The Coolscan 9000 ED for 120mm is very expensive for me and i don't know if there are cheaper alternatives.
So, i would like to know what is the better thing:
- shot with 120mm negative films (as Yashica Mat 124) and scan with Flat scanner (as Epson Photo)
or
shot with 35mm negative films (as Contax+Zeiss lens) and scan with Filmscanner (as Nikon Coolscan)
?
The scanner can record no more information than what is in the negative. A 120 negative is about 6 times the size of a 35mm negative. All else being equal, the 120 negative will always have more resolution and detail than the 35mm negative.
If image quality is the main concern, the 120 film and Epson scanner will yield better results.
- Nikon 24-120mm f/3.5-5.6G AF-S VR or Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 24-120mm f/4G?
- What is the resolution of 6x6 120 film scanned on nikon 9000 ed at 4000 dpi?
- Is Nikon AF-D 24-120mm a good lens for Nikon DX?
- Compare the Nikon 24-120mm f/3.5-5.6D Lens with the Nikon 55-200mm f/4-5.6G?
- Does the Nikon AF-S 24-120mm f/3.5-5.6G IF-ED VR and 4G work on the Nikon d810?