I though the Nikon D5100 had better low light performance than the canon t3i?
In this review
Nikon: http://www.popphoto.com/gear/2011/05/camera-test-nikon-d5100-dslr?page=0, 1
Canon: http://www.popphoto.com/gear/2011/04/lab-test-canon-t3i?page=0, 1
It states from the test results that canon has better image quality ( especially in low light!) i thought it was the other way around. (i know there's no REAL difference ) but i was lead to believe it would be better for low light and had the edge when it came to the sensor. Is this review wrong or bias?
You don't actually believe those guys do you? One guy says this another guy says that and still another says something else.
Why would you even consider basing a camera purchase on what all these guys like and don't like.
The real question is, what do you like? What do you want?
Buy based on what you want and need not what a bunch of guys beating the bushes tell you.
- Which has better low light performance - Canon 5D mk3 OR Nikon D800?
- Canon model good low light performance camera?
- Is Nikon or canon better? And what dslr is a good starting camera, something better than t3i or t5i to start with?
- How is the low light performance of the Nikon D7000?
- Best digital camera for quality images, low light performance and speed?