Do Nikon's DX format lenses scale up?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1432a/1432a8bb816820ca729f4675b00474812858618a" alt="Guest Guest"
This month's Popular Photography has a review of Nikon's 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G DX ED VR AF-S lens. In the first paragraph, they say it scales up to the full-frame equivalent of 82.5-450mm. Does it? I was under the impression that it was only FX lenses that do that on a DX body, not vice-versa.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/160eb/160ebce10fb0e61086601523e0e3810cefe3d5a1" alt="George Y George Y"
The physical difference between DX and FX lenses is the diameter of the light-path, or the width of the glass within. It doesn't matter if the lens is DX or FX - on a DX camera, you effectively get an optical view that's 1.5x the marked focal length of the lens.
An FX 50mm on a FX camera is 50mm. On a DX camera, the same lens give you the viewpoint of a 75mm lens.
A DX 35mm on a DX camera gives you a 52.5mm view. On an FX camera, the image is cropped, but Nikon wisely has their full-frame FX digitals automatically adjust to the DX frame size for those lenses.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40a0f/40a0f5af6d8d1ec0996cff659c2bc4133f6a59b6" alt="retiredPhil retiredPhil"
Yes, it does scale up. That's because that in spite of it being a DX lens, they state the focal length in 35mm terms. Stating everything in 35mm equivalency allows for better communication.