Full frame lens on a dx body ok?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41dd9/41dd91d0e19d07f6ebab5a49ef3187ca8618710f" alt="Ric Ric"
I just bought a Nikon - 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED-IF AF-S VR Telephoto Lens
without realizing (foolishly) that it's made for an FX camera body and all I have is a DX body (D3200).
Took it out for a test last night and I like it! A lot!
However, would the 55-300mm for DX be a better choice? It's much cheaper. Would the photo quality be any different? Is the more expensive lens a better choice overall because it has better glass or a bigger filter or what?
"Wow me" with your camera knowledge because I have less then a year at this photographic habit and I'm still learning (everyday!).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bb29d/bb29d0713d6f7e1df86a29e170135472fcfd63d5" alt="Martin Martin"
FX lenses work fine on DX bdies. It is an AF-S lens so it will also autofocus fine. I use one on my DX D7000 body and it is a really nice lens.No, the 55-300 would not be a better choice. The 70-300 VR is a great lens and focuses very quickly. It has high quality glass. The 55-300 is far slower at focusing and nowhere near as good glass quality. Stick with the 70-300.It was a good choice.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eec72/eec72764d11c4c57a215690e47653d7f430c301e" alt="dexter dexter"
Yeah, what Martin said.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c5cf5/c5cf5f0bcdb9362c15ae295d7d229dc531ac2c4a" alt="deep blue2 deep blue2"
Good choice - stick with it. No problem using FX glass on DX bodies.
The 55-300mm quality will be worse.