Which point and shoot camera is most recommended?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e47c0/e47c0eaacf0a3e4415a1027fb98625e05bd54793" alt="Sapphire Sapphire"
1. Olympus trip S
2. Canon prima 4
3. Fuji DL 400 tele super
4. Olympus accura zoom 105
5. Nikon af600
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1432a/1432a8bb816820ca729f4675b00474812858618a" alt="Guest Guest"
When will conservatives stop being so obsessed with shooting stuff? Geeze, you guys are nothing but clones of one another.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/201de/201de2ea02418c8643199061b5e0739725969c76" alt="qrk qrk"
For a 35mm film camera, I would go with an Olympus XA. My XA has taken a beating and is still working. Another bonus, the XA light meter is very accurate.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1432a/1432a8bb816820ca729f4675b00474812858618a" alt="Guest Guest"
The problem with old used point and shoot cameras is they get too much dust within the inside of the lens that can't be easily cleaned which will degrade the quality of the photos you take. SLR's can be more easily cleaned, and you should look into that if you really want to head down the path of 35mm film.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c9762/c97620e41d52001b403d586e4ff41ecea273c73b" alt="keerok keerok"
The Prima for ease of use, the DL400 for fun, or the AF600 for zoom.