Is sigma 35mm F1.4 much better, than NIkkor 35mm F1.4?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0bcca/0bccaaba9fc688342e8a2d2815f3802b063c5eea" alt="ruslan ruslan"
ruslan
I would like to buy one
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b36d7/b36d76b7601fab18e6fb344d861cc2ce5156bed6" alt="Mr White Mr White"
Mr White
Both lens have a weak price/quality ratio.
The Nikon 35mm f/1, 4G Cons:
-huge vignetting on full frame.
-It produce high chromatic aberration.
-Significant coma.
-Noticeable astigmatism.
The Sigma 35mm f/1, 4 Cons:
-Huge vignetting on the Aps-c sensor.
If you are using a DX sensor you're better off buying the 35mm f/1, 8G, price/quality ratio is way better, however if you need the f/1, 4 aperture, the Sigma will be sharper than the Nikon at f/1, 4.
Home › Camera Lenses↓ Related posts
- Why is the Nikkor 35mm f/1.4 way, way bigger than the Nikkor 35mm f/1.8 (DX)?
- Why is the Nikkor 35mm f/1.4 Way more expensive than the Nikkor 35mm f/1.8?
- Why is the nikkor 35mm f/2D more expensive than the nikkor 35mm f/1.8G?
- Why is the nikkor 80-200mm f2.8D much cheaper than the nikkor 70-200mm f2.8G vr2?
- Is the Nikkor 50mm f/1.4 better than the Nikkor 50mm f/1.8?