Any camera which uses both on chip/sensor and on lens image stabilization same time?

Is there any camera which uses both on chip/sensor image stabilization and on lens image stabilization both as same time?

I know some people will say that first image will hit to lens so stabilization on lens are better than on sensor but I think if sensor is moving and making correct alignment with lens then also same thing happen so I don't think that weather lens move or sensor move to make correct alignment in order to form correct image

Ultimately understanding that, wheatear image is blur or not (due to out of alignment) is made by sensor only and then sensor will instruct lens mote to focus lens to correct alignment so here sensor is master/host. So if sensor is moving instead of lens to create correct alignment then also it's good and you can avoid lens mote noise and also can purchase lens without IS (Cheap lens). But I don't know why nikon or other are not developing 5 axis or 6 axis on sensor stabilization.

You can use OS lenses on cameras with sensor shift stabilisation but it's not recommended. I admit to not having tried it, but the manual warns against it.

Would this help?

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/...lizer.html

IF not, then this should be the closest you can get in-camera.

http://www.amazon.com/...teewill-20

I know of no company that uses both sensor and lens image stabilization. This strikes me as overkill and an unnecessary expense. Kind of a belt and suspenders approach to image stabilization. It would be incredibly rare that you would need that much stabilization that wouldn't be more cost effective to use some other form of camera stabilization, such as a tripod.

The image stabilization schemes of on sensor and on lens would not play well together unless the lens with IS/VR was designed for the camera system with an on-board IS scheme.

So far, IS or VR schemes in lenses actually perform better than the schemes which are sensor based. Lens IS/VR schemes are designed specifically for the focal lengths on that lens, so can be fine tuned for more stabilization. The advantage of lens-based VR is that a separate algorithm confirms the stabilization effect when you press the shutter release button halfway.

Sensor IS has to try to work well with any and all focal lengths, so while working well, they are still limited as to how slow the shutter speed can before blur starts showing up.

Lens based stabilization also has advantages over in-body stabilization. In low-light or low-contrast situations, the auto-focus system is able to work more accurately when the image coming from the lens is already stabilized

NOTE: Do not be fooled by claims of "Digital IS". All that does is automatically raise the ISO sensitivity of the sensor, thus raising the shutter speed, but adding noise to the image

There's no brand out there that has in-body image stabilization (IBIS) and stabilized lenses too. Nikon and Canon has stabilized lenses only. Pentax is the only DSLR that has IBIS. Sony and Olympus also use IBIS.

Sony has their Alpha 7 series which has in-body image stabilization. You can use any lens from any brand via lens adapters. So what happens when you use a Nikon lens with VR or a Canon lens with IS on a Sony A7 with IBIS? Can you use both at the same time? No, you can either use the stabilizer within the lens or IBIS, but not both at the same time. You'd most likely use the 5-axis IBIS over VR or IS.